[color=#000]
Why Jesus was not theMessiah
為什麼耶穌不是彌賽亞（救世主）？？一個耶穌老鄉猶太人的控訴。
在猶太人的歷史裡面，耶穌不是唯一的自稱是「彌賽亞」的人，
有好幾個自稱是「彌賽亞」的都欺騙了我們，這些人搞詭計而且
還有所謂的信徒以及跟隨者。所有這些所謂「彌賽亞」最後不是
被「用石頭給砸死」就是「吊死」（包括釘十字架），所有這些
自稱彌賽亞的最後都跟耶穌一樣被「迫害或者侮辱就跟耶穌一
樣」（猶太人實在太恨他們了），他們最後也都會「受苦」就跟
耶穌一樣，難道他們都承擔了人類的罪惡嗎？？為什麼沒有？？
耶穌根本就無法證明他自己至少是個「先知」，他「偽造」了他
的所謂「神跡」。我們願意在此教導基督徒他們所謂的「上帝偽
造了那些神跡」。
Please link to您可以上 www.geocities.com/logic_faith/and if possible like this或者: Miracles of Jesus
TheMessiah彌賽亞。
在猶太教裡面從來就沒有相信過所謂「受苦的彌賽亞」這件事，就是基督教裡面的「保羅」都承認，在「舊約聖經」裡面從來就沒有預言過啟示。
以弗所書三章四節，保羅自己承認在舊約聖經裡面從來沒有「啟示說彌賽亞要來」，也承認這是個「新的神秘故事」。所以，「受苦的彌賽亞完全是基督徒自己宣稱的（ 請看「受苦僕人以賽亞53」就是以色列國，不是基督徒宣稱的彌賽亞）。但是基督徒扭曲了舊約聖經，只是想證明一件從來不存在的事情是存在的。就像基督徒指責我們猶太人修改了他們的新約聖經（但是我們改過更好）。
舊約聖經如何談論彌賽亞？？What did the Tenach say about theMessiah?
(Habakkuk 3:13) 你前來拯救您的人民，拯救被你抹油（祝福）的，你會把邪惡的頭給壓碎，You come forth to saveyour people, to saveyour anointed one. You crush the heads of thewicked, you lay bare their bases at the neck…
依照這個「預言」，上帝一定會拯救抹油的那位，如果耶穌就是那個抹油（上帝祝福）的，那麼上帝一定會拯救他，所以邏輯上來說，如果耶穌就是彌賽亞，上帝一定會救他，但是，最後的情況不是如此，耶穌在最受侮辱的死法中去世。耶穌甚至死在其它犯罪分子之前，這兩個犯罪分子跟他一起被釘十字架（據約翰福音），這種情況，讓耶穌變得比犯罪分子還要脆弱。
(Ps91:1) You who dwell in the shelter of the MostHigh, who abide in the shadow of the Almighty, 2 say tothe Lord, 「My refuge and fortress, my God in whom I trust.」3 God will rescue you from the fowler』s snare, from thedestroying plague… 11 For God commands the angels to guardyou in all your ways. 12With their hands they shall support you, lest youstrike your foot against a stone…
上帝命令他的天使去保護「彌賽亞」，但是好像這件事沒有發生在耶穌身上，因為「耶穌不是彌賽亞」。
Godcommands his angels to protect his Messiah. Surely this didn』thappen to Jesus, because Jesus was not the Messiah!
Our Website
這個網站是要教育基督徒有關所謂上帝的「假神跡」。
This website is intended to educate Christiansabout the fake miracles of their god.
撒核定（猶太教的最高法院）最後裁定「耶穌因為假造神跡是有罪的」（這件事記錄在猶太教的法典中）（下面實在是太長了，就讓大家自己練習一下英文，特別是基督徒，如果您的良心還在）
TheSanhedrin (the highest Jewish court) found Jesus guilty of doingfake miracles (documented in the Talmud)... Christians claim that the Jews brought forward falsewitnesses to the Sanhedrin to testify against him... SinceChristians do not believe the Talmud, we are taking the onlyevidence that they believe in, the New Testament. We are not sayingthat the gospels are not genuine, on the contrary, we are sayingthat they are competent and satisfactory evidence. Christiansbelieve that the gospels are genuine from the original authors. Wedo not have a problem with this. 'Luke' does not claim to be adirect eyewitness to the miracles but collecting oral traditions;he says so. Maybe this is why we cannot find the required level ofdetails in his gospel. 'John' contains explicit details that we canreally examine. Christians believe that he is a direct eyewitnessand recorded specific details; we do not have a problem with that.We look into his details to find our answers. We are looking intothis evidence to determine if they were real miracles or justhoaxes like those performed by many who claimed to be theMessiah.
We believe that the gospels didnot have a divine origin, that is, they were not dictated by God.We believe that the authors documented the circulating oraltraditions into gospels. 'Luke' even declares that this is what hedid and that he was not a direct eyewitness. However the gospel'John' seems to include the details of an eyewitness and not justcollecting circulating oral traditions. We are not challenging theauthorship nor the dating of the composition because no one haspresented any solid material or evidence for us toexamine.
Now wehave the New Testament. If we need to investigate what reallyhappened we should look into what a direct eyewitness wrote. 'John'seems to be a good direct eyewitness account for us to examine (orat least this is what Christians claim and build their faith on).What he reported into a gospel reveals that people were trickedinto believing that those were genuine miracles, resurrection… Thedisciples and the Jews were tricked into believing that Jesus wasthe Messiah. They really believed what they saw and lived by it.They were even ready to die for their belief. We are notchallenging their belief at all, nor accusing them of lying. We arejust proving to them that what the disciples and the people saw(and then later Christians believed without seeing) were notmiracles at all. They were tricks that could be done again today byany con man with the help of only a single smart associate (or abeloved smart disciple).
Howcould we accept Jesus as a genuine prophet (let alone a god) and wecan show you how he performed hoaxes and acts of intelligence? Evenhis resurrection was staged and we can easily show you how. Webelieve that they were hoaxes. Atheists believe that the 『miracles』were rumors... Moslems, however, believe that Jesus was theIsraelite Messiah and performed real miracles indeed but thegospels were fabricated to implicate him. In the end, we all agreethat what』s portrayed in the gospels are hoaxes. If Christians wantus and the rest of the religions to believe in their 『Christ』, thenwhy don』t they simply prove us wrong that those couldn』t have beenhoaxes?
Youare welcomed to refute the 『Fake Miracles』 section and prove uswrong. We are ready to provide a link to your webpage or even hostyour rebuttal on our own website. By this not only you will end a2000-year old dilemma, but also you will surely become anAll-Time-Saint.
Looking forward to share your thoughts.
